|
Post by Legend. on Jan 5, 2010 22:31:09 GMT -5
RAW - 3.78 Rating.
...and now..
get ready for it...
TNA...
they had...
a 1.5 Rating.
|
|
|
Post by steele on Jan 5, 2010 22:37:57 GMT -5
that is not bad for TNA though.
|
|
|
Post by Legend. on Jan 5, 2010 23:31:33 GMT -5
Yes, it is good to note that the usual TNA Rating is around a 0.7, so they more than doubled their weekly rating.
While the average RAW rating is around a 3.8, so it is right at the average, so Bret Hart being there really did nothing for ratings.
|
|
|
Post by steele on Jan 5, 2010 23:32:48 GMT -5
wasnt RAW pulling around 7.0 at the height of WWE vs WCW?
|
|
|
Post by Falco Fusion on Jan 6, 2010 19:23:57 GMT -5
I say the only winners were the advertisers. It was hilarious for TNA to advertise during Raw though. Although what's next? Are they going to give away the results of the main events again? With Bischoff in control once again, I have a feeling that he's going to drag yet another company down the drain.
|
|
|
Post by Lex Largon on Jan 6, 2010 19:33:39 GMT -5
OH, Fusion i agree with you. Bischoff will most likely destroy TNA. Although i hope that doesn't happen because i like the thought of Waltman and Hall and Nash all together again. I think they are the SH*T!
|
|
|
Post by Rod Lightning on Jan 7, 2010 11:49:19 GMT -5
OH, Fusion i agree with you. Bischoff will most likely destroy TNA. Although i hope that doesn't happen because i like the thought of Waltman and Hall and Nash all together again. I think they are the SH*T! Exactly!
|
|
|
Post by Ritter on Jan 7, 2010 12:59:50 GMT -5
TNA won. RAW had Bret at the start and finish, but the middle was same old, same old. TNA had GREAT segments, plus the Knockout Title Match and TNA World Title matches were AWESOME although the first match was crappy camera angles and hard to follow, while the Blueprint/Hernendez vs Raven/Stevie match was pointless..
|
|