|
|
Post by Falco Fusion on Jan 21, 2010 22:33:20 GMT -5
I think this was actually worse than the Montreal Screw Job.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scott Smith on Jan 23, 2010 1:39:19 GMT -5
get em brawler!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by drew on Jan 23, 2010 13:13:16 GMT -5
Triple H is a f*g no matter what.. with a nose that you can have an HD view of in the Nose Bleeds.. and killing young talent.. oh and "being behind" one or two guys in the locker room so they get pushed and take it from deserving people.
|
|
|
|
Post by The British Hero!!! on Jan 23, 2010 13:41:52 GMT -5
One thing as always confused me with HHH. Why, in evolution, was Batista the future and HHH the present? Batista is older than HHH.
|
|
|
|
Post by steele on Jan 23, 2010 14:57:45 GMT -5
Because Batista was new to wrestilng. I think HHH had a stretch many years ago when he put on some great matches. The wear and tear has shown on him and between injuries he is pretty averge in the ring. He is also a horrible face, much stronger as a heel.
The WWE has a really poor wrestilng product right now. their matches are just lacking.
|
|
|
|
Post by kittie on Jan 23, 2010 15:40:25 GMT -5
batista going to retire soon orton future of wrestling. really at least hhh let batista beat him three pay per views in a row but hhh is going to be going far longer after batista leaves. at least hhh didnt beat undertaker at wrestlermania yet
|
|
|
|
Post by Falco Fusion on Jan 24, 2010 16:37:07 GMT -5
batista going to retire soon orton future of wrestling. really at least hhh let batista beat him three pay per views in a row but hhh is going to be going far longer after batista leaves. at least hhh didnt beat undertaker at wrestlermania yet Time to correct Kittie. Not only has HHH never beat Taker at Wrestlemania, HHH doesn't have a single win over Taker in his career. |
|
(shown during week two)
