|
Post by The British Hero!!! on Apr 25, 2009 9:38:24 GMT -5
At this thread you get to say your say on whether WWE or TNA is the better corporation.
Mine has to be TNA it just has better, younger talent when all WWE use are the same guys (Cena, HHH, Undertaker etc.)
|
|
|
Post by Ritter on Apr 25, 2009 14:28:39 GMT -5
Well.. Usualy I had to say the the WWE "stories" were better and the TNA "matches" were better. If you didnt' watch TNA every week but you bought a PPV you were entertained by the matches, but if you didn't watch WWE every week and you got a WWE PPV then the matches didn't seem all that great because you weren't emotionaly involved in the stories behind the matches
|
|
|
Post by dayzill on Apr 25, 2009 14:37:44 GMT -5
Probably WWE never watched TNA much.
|
|
|
Post by kingslushy on Apr 25, 2009 22:13:16 GMT -5
I quite like WWE better, the other day i watched TNA Lockdown 09 and it seemed boring, except the Main event, Xcape match, Lethal lockdown and abyss blueprint, it probably semmed boring bacause all matches were something to do with 6 sides of steel.
LETHAL LOCKDOWN WAS EXTREME
But with WWE, the match you watch your into, but for me, Matches in lockdown except those 4 i was waiting for them to end!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Scott Smith on Apr 25, 2009 23:03:49 GMT -5
It's a toss up for me. I think it's even. They both offer different stuff. It's like old school WWF and old school WCW.. the WWF seemed for into the show and WCW seemed more into the athletic side of things. Now I didn't see lockdown, but lets take Wrestlemania that I did see.. in WWE's Wrestlmanina, "THE" ppv of the year, I felt half the matches (Money in the bank, Hardy vs Hardy, Jericho vs Steamboat, HBK/Undertaker) were AWESOME but half the matches (Diva battle royal, Cena/Show/Edge, HHH/Orton) kinda sucked.
|
|
|
Post by Rod Lightning on Apr 26, 2009 3:18:41 GMT -5
If i were to chose between these 2 it would be a draw. I grew up with WCW so...
|
|
|
Post by Bloodbath on Apr 26, 2009 21:11:36 GMT -5
well,i think wwe is better,though tna has a few good guys,including former wwe stars,they arn't a major threat to wwe.although i have to admit,the graphics in their game are waaaaay better than wwe's.but,some of tna's storylines are better.and they have some of the craziest matches ever(the ultimate x match,and of course the six-sides of steel).plus the ring is perfect for matches.i mean,seriously,have you ever seen a 6 man tag match where all six guys can be on the top turnbuckle at once?
|
|
|
Post by brandonripley on Apr 26, 2009 22:00:37 GMT -5
I just had a nasty thought. When you first said Ultimate X, the first thing I thought of was a gimmick that was a combination of The X and The Ultimate Killer. Talk about screwed lol
|
|
|
Post by shocking1981 on Apr 26, 2009 23:16:58 GMT -5
It's a toss up for me. I think it's even. They both offer different stuff. It's like old school WWF and old school WCW.. the WWF seemed for into the show and WCW seemed more into the athletic side of things. Now I didn't see lockdown, but lets take Wrestlemania that I did see.. in WWE's Wrestlmanina, "THE" ppv of the year, I felt half the matches (Money in the bank, Hardy vs Hardy, Jericho vs Steamboat, HBK/Undertaker) were AWESOME but half the matches (Diva battle royal, Cena/Show/Edge, HHH/Orton) kinda sucked. Amen, brother. But I think the WWE PG policy is slowly giving TNA the edge to me. And if I remember correctly, there was a similar "family friendly" policy implemented by the AOL-Time Warner guys just before the end of WCW.
|
|
|
Post by dmoney on Apr 28, 2009 22:03:20 GMT -5
TNA all the way. Having seen both WWE and TNA live, I would say that TNA caters more to the fans than WWE. That and Dixie Carter is known to bring fans backstage during the show to meet and talk to the wrestlers, while Vince is known to throw fans out if they bring in signs that go against WWE policy or storylines. One that I read about at Armagedon 2008 (where Jeff Hardy won the world title) was when a fan gave Batista the finger and was thrown out of the arena into the freezing rain.
|
|